The time honored debate about the role of laws in physics has received an influx of fresh views with the increased significance of symmetries in quantum field theories. Crudely, the symmetries appear to bind the physical properties of spacetime in such a way as to make the traditional Humean views of properties as being categorical untenable, which, in turn, reinforces the views of laws as ‘guiders’ rather than ‘describers’. This paper argues that this position is wrong, supporting the viability of Humeanism about laws.
Category Archives: Philosophy
Making Past Hypothesis More Robust. Issues in the philosophy of Statistical Mechanics
The emergence of statistical mechanics (SM) as a science in the late 19th century was marred by conceptual difficulties from the outset. Past Hypothesis is hailed as the solution to the issue of matching time-reversal invariant laws of motion and thermodynamic processes that evolve monotonically in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics. PH establishes the link between statistical mechanics and early universe cosmology and is an exercise loaded with controversy. I point out the arguments that would make it more credible.
Hegel’s Notion and Physical System Specification in Quantum Mechanics
Rarely does a present-day philosopher of natural science make reference to, let alone engage with, the views of Kant and Hegel. This paper claims that such a connection exists and is relevant. I will illuminate the playing field by running parallels with the topical issue of the foundations of physics, the specifications for quantum mechanical systems. The discussion will touch upon some technical aspects of properties of such systems. I will strive not to lose the reader in the field-specific jargon.
Popular Physics
Best popular science books covering present day outlook on everything from Quantum Mechanics to Cosmology and written by bone fide professors of physics (as opposed to the esoteric charlatans) are: more
Mathematical vs Linguistic Representation of Reality
Philosophers of science are a verbose bunch of people. Most often they discuss the foundational paradoxes of physics using common language. Linguistics of any kind, even the most precise sort, is a poor substitute for the mathematical rigor when applied to the description of the fundamental fabric of reality for two reasons. One is that it carries a semantic load, therefore subjecting the definitions to interpretation based on the meaning of the words used, and meanings are often different to different users. The second reason is that the languages we use are conditioned on human experience that is inevitably classical in nature and therefore is nigh on useless when applied to non-classical settings, such as those of Quantum Mechanics or General Relativity. more
God Particle? Framing Science in Divine Terms
I am not qualified to opine on whether the CERN announcement on July 4 2012 validates the existence of the elusive particle, although the statistical significance at a level of 5.1 sigma is above the 5 mark – a threshold that is commonly assumed to qualify for a scientific discovery. more
Wave Function and Schrodinger’s Cat
I am so enamored with the below explanation following my two-year-long study of the mathematical version of Quantum Mechanics, as well as its philosophical foundations, that I am reprinting it in full from the Discover Magazine blog: more
Reducing Thermodynamics to Statistical Mechanics
Quote
The foundational controversy of thermodynamics (TD) is the monotonic behavior of state functions of macro-systems. Intuitively, this should not be the case, as these systems are composed of micro-particles that are guided by deterministic time-reversible quasi-periodic laws of motion. Here is my view: more